Search for: "North v. State"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 13,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
The Eighth Circuit Historical Society has an online video commemorating Gideon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
Moreover, the Court said that North Carolina law is to the same effect. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Brady v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:00 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
In State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
In Kerry v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:00 pm
Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina; Rejecting the state's appeal, the justices left intact a federal appeals court ruling that said the measure violated doctors' speech rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am
Without comment, it refused a plea by state officials in North Carolina to restore a law requiring ultrasound displays before an abortion could go ahead. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This case concerns cuts enacted by a local council in 2012 and addresses a claim, brought by a ‘qualifying young person’ that, in applying cuts to the local budget, the council of North Somerset failed to have due regard to its statutory obligations to protect young and disabled members within its area of authority. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
Hunt v North Somerset Council, heard 29 April 2015. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:06 am
<> Pesticide Action Network v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Appellants later filed this putative class action in the District of North Dakota, claiming that the United States had breached its fiduciary duty by approving the leases for the oil and gas mining rights, and that the defendant bidders aided, abetted, and induced the United States to breach that duty. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
” At the Knowledge Center of the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen discusses the Court’s recent grant in another redistricting case, Shapiro v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
