Search for: "Opened in Error"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 10,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm
They challenge the view that bots are “mere tools” used for extension of the self by contracting parties.[1] In doing so, they assert differences between “closed” and “open”[2] systems and various theoretical types of bots, arguing that parties who use bots as part of contracting should be protected from contract liability in some cases of bot error or malfunction. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:26 am
Attempts by the applicants to re-open the case were in due course dismissed, principally on the grounds that this mistake of fact by the HSE, and hence by the Court, was not part of the essential reasoning of the court. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
These represent particularly damaging forms of hospital errors. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:00 pm
The mistaken party must be reasonably prompt in giving notice of its error; 2. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
The Court appears to have completely overlooked the opening qualifier – “Subject to sections 91 and 123…”. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:28 am
BANK ERROR IN YOUR FAVOR! [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
He held that in this case it could not as the Trust’s clear acceptance that its errors had led to Melanie’s death was sufficient to amount to an admission “in substance” of a breach of Article 2 [64-72]. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
Using audio editing software, Fernandez made a digital copy of the Bon Bon Song and altered it with the result that the promiment opening to the Bon Bon Song (the Spanish words 'je, je, je, je, je, mira que tu estas rica') were deleted and replaced by the Audio Drop (the 'Mixed Bon Bon Version'). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
In my judgment, at any rate in a case where no arbitration has been commenced and none is intended to be commenced, but a party goes to court to ask it to protect its interest in a right to have its disputes settled in accordance with its arbitration agreement, it is open to the court to consider whether, and how best, if at all, to protect such a right to arbitrate. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
In my judgment, at any rate in a case where no arbitration has been commenced and none is intended to be commenced, but a party goes to court to ask it to protect its interest in a right to have its disputes settled in accordance with its arbitration agreement, it is open to the court to consider whether, and how best, if at all, to protect such a right to arbitrate. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
The case involves convictions for aggravated murder, murder, attempted murer, aggravated robbery, and firearms specifications, and a life without parole sentence (consecutive to 41 years on the other stuff), and the court’s opinion dispenses with the eight assignments of error in a brisk twelve pages. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
[Hat-tip: Poynter's Regret the Error blog.] [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The request stated that the withdrawal was made in error and a correction should be made to the effect that the application was not withdrawn. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:58 am
More than a third said they did not completely agree it was necessary to disclose “all serious medical errors to affected patients. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
”Finally, the error was not harmless. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Suffice it to say that some evidence rulings that are wrong may be viewed as prejudicial and as warranting a reversal, while most are considered by the appellate courts as "harmless error. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:32 pm
A few years back Grits posed the question, "Is babysitting while white reasonable suspicion for police questioning? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Open access as a tool: eliminate liability for identifying hostage works and freeing the works, but require them to correct errors when identified. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
By a letter of 13 March the Prosecutor replied to the complainant that the contested decision was not an administrative decision breaching his terms of appointment or applicable rules and regulations and thus was not open to review. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
The plaintiff then appealed.Analysis: At the Court of Appeals, the plaintiff argued that it was error to construe the term "handicap" to create a demanding standard. [read post]
