Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7321 - 7340 of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 11:31 pm
También pueden servir para elaborar estadísticas oficiales sometidas al secreto estadístico, en los términos previstos en la Ley 12/1989, de 9 de mayo, de la Función Estadística Pública y en las leyes de estadística de las comunidades autónomas con competencia en la materia”. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm by Josh Wright
The third is the oft-repeated claim that the FTCA doesn’t involve collateral consequences because (1) there is no private right of action under it and (2) the FTCA doesn’t involve treble damages. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:27 pm by Gustavo Arballo
En este marco el espectro es un bien público escaso que la ley debe organizar. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
Estrada snatched the cell phone from her hand and ordered, `Don't fucking turn around or I am gonna fucking blast you, bitch. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
§ 1152(a)(1) provides: (A) Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discrimina [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:00 am by sevach
 Parece que cierto juez se tomó la libertad de introducir en su sentencia varios párrafos en verso. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm by Ed Sim
Their growth to over $509mm of revenue from $281mm 2 years ago is a case in point. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm by John P. Ahlers, Lindsay K. Taft
  Similarly, the Federal Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit[2] has stated that "[t]he owner of land owns as much of the space above him as he uses, but only so long as he uses it. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:56 am by Steven Boutwell
Hotels.com), 225 Cal.App.4th 56 (2014), review granted 329 P.3d 192 (Cal. 2014). [2] See City of Atlanta v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Lucas, 472 Mass. 387, 401 (2015) (discussing, though ultimately rejecting, the timing concern as an argument for banning lies in an election campaign). [2] Brown v. [read post]