Search for: "POST PROPERTIES, INC."
Results 7321 - 7340
of 9,336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Rojas Properties, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:11 am
The motion to assume the agreement with Folio Hospitality Management was filed on March 3, 2011, although initial court filings expressed the debtor's intent to transfer management of the hotel property from Joie de Vivre Hospitality, Inc. to Folio and Preferred Hotel Group (collectively, referred to below as Folio). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm
In Fieldston Property Owners Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
As mentioned in a previous post on this site captioned “Amazon.com apparently has been assessed $269 million in uncollected Texas sales taxes,” last fall the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts made a $269 million sales and use tax assessment against Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm
A new "first-window" post-grant patent opposition system with broader jurisdiction (but a shorter timeframe) than reexaminations. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm
See our February 4, 2011 post for more details. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
On August 14, 2008, Amsted Industries Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm
Posted with the permission of the National Inventors Hall of Fame™ [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm
+The+Miss+Bexar+County+Organization+Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
A.V.E.L.A., Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Property, intangible) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this ‘Fur Rondy’ jewellery design (TTABlog) [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
As for a Notice of Sale, it must be recorded, published, mailed and posted but not personally served. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
Johnson Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:32 am
The responding trademark organizations point out that trademark holders have a duty to protect their intellectual property, or lose it. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
(In re Cyphermint, Inc.) [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:32 pm
(For more on why I think such temporary injunctions are unconstitutional, though limited permanent injunctions after a full trial are allowed, see this article, which discusses intellectual property injunctions but which cites cases that deal with libel injunctions; see also this post on a recent Kentucky Supreme Court decision that reflects this distinction.) [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
However, consumer class action is not the subject of this post. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
The choice between ex parte and inter partes reexamination is sometimes complex and one addressed in a recent post (here). [read post]
