Search for: "People v Johns" Results 7321 - 7340 of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
The first great Chief Justice, John Marshall, did yeoman work in establishing this role and approach for the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
It also includes the writings of such originalist scholars as well as Nathaniel Chapman, John Harrison, Kurt Lash, Michael McConnell, Ryan Williams, and Ilan Wurman. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Ilya Somin
John Locke famously defended such rights in the 17th century. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
In Part I of this series, I concluded that the “president cannot obstruct justice when he exercises his lawful authority that is vested by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
” And moving beyond the courts, oaths might even be beyond the capacity of other members of the legislature to judge: in Bond v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
"Not surprisingly, John's concerns largely parallel ours. [read post]