Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 7321 - 7340 of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
In response, Smith & Nephew rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
ADDED: Here is the opinion, which is based on the proper role of the courts in a system of separation of powers: In Goodland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
These new regulations are but one piece of the surge in GHG regulations the EPA is adopting under the Clean Air Act as a consequence of Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, the HSBA Appellate Section hosted a distinguished panel to discuss the United States Supreme Court’s recent healthcare decision, otherwise known as National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:39 pm by Ilya Somin
More generally, I don’t see how federal judges performing weddings undermines federalism either by allowing states to intrude on federal power or vice versa. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:13 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Native Wholesale Supply Company v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
State, 929 So.2d 13 (2006) (citing Rakas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm by Ilya Somin
Madison decision) is intrinsically an anti-democratic power…. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:08 pm by Amanda Simon, ACLU
It was first proposed by former Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008 after the Bush administration lost the Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:03 am by Russ Bensing
  Well, they did; in State v. [read post]