Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
But these handguns were more popular in Europe and in the United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:21 pm
In the pending cases United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Unfortunately for Kevin Rangel-Guzman, the drug detection dog at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry was having a fine day on September 5, 2011, when Rangel-Guzman and a friend attempted to reenter the United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
For the jury to have found Katakis guilty of obstruction of justice, it had to find that the government proved each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:[1] that defendant Katakis knowingly altered, destroyed, or concealed electronic records or documents; [2] that defendant Katakis acted with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence an investigation that he either knew of or contemplated; and [3] that the investigation was about a matter by or within the jurisdiction of the… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15] IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
California: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-132_8l9c.pdf United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:00 am
Cruz v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled otherwise. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:47 pm
After the original version of the Apple v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
The enactment of VARA followed closely on the heels of U.S. membership in the Berne Convention in 1989, and probably owes its pedigree, at least to some extent, to art protection statutes in U.S. states such as California’s Art Preservation Act (CAPA, 1979) and New York’s Artists Authorship Rights Act (1984). [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:07 am
The doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to a plaintiff’s claim for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period, according to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:47 am
It now includes a discussion of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Navarette v. [read post]
