Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 9,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
With the exchange rate, his income converted to approximately $26,000 U.S. dollars per year. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Wayt v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
In Doggett v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 3:38 am
However, in Park Electrochemical Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:56 pm
Hargrove, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:19 pm
Second, the main point of the court’s Commerce Clause argument is that not having health insurance counts as an “activity” rather than inactivity: Far from “inactivity,” by choosing to forgo insurance plaintiffs are making an economic decision to try to pay for health care services later, out of pocket, rather than now through the purchase of insurance, collectively shifting billions of dollars, $43 billion in 2008, onto other market participants Because… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:47 am
Our Response: This issue was recently ruled upon by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in KLEMM v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
Michael V. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:02 am
These records prove the administration is using taxpayer dollars to manipulate public opinion. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:17 pm
I like the argument because, where I practice, the State frequently reminds its license holders that they enjoy no vested right in the renewal of those licenses. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 7:51 am
Regulatory Rollback and Legal Challenges The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 9:59 am
This has already happened in one case, Ogletree v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
Here's one we recommend to readers of this blog who are fighting some types of pharmaceutical or medical device class actions in Texas state courts: Citizens Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 3:43 am
" The United States Constitution similarly requires that, "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
Emanuel v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:22 pm
As the United States Supreme Court said over 100 years ago in Coffin v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:02 pm
Add to that, the attorney's fees which could be thousands of dollars [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:39 pm
” See U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
He also called Vladimir V. [read post]
