Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm by Ilya Somin
" Reply Brief for United States 6; see also Brief for Appellees New York Immigration Coalition et al. 15 (citing a prior Government estimate that doing so will exclude approximately "50,000 ICE detainees"). [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
And there are those who think John Yoo, et al., might actually be tried in such a court. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
  I also want to  wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United  States of  America,  a  happy Fourth of July. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
The litigation, then, should provide the United States (or its allies) little comfort unless it is sure that it has its own infrastructure houses in order. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
Patriot Act to include computers located outside the United States if they communicate with the United States or are involved in commerce with the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
The case is [2012] NZHC 2076 - The United States of America v Dotcom & Ors. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:29 pm
(Members Liebman, Schaumber, and Kirsanow participated.) *** Valley Central Emergency Veterinary Hospital (4-CA-33631, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 107) Whitehall, PA May 23, 2007. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am by pscamp01
Bogle et al. pay thrity -five per cent ad valorem on “sauce. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
Thus, even if one is ultimately of the view that Munaf and Omar (et al.) don't have strong substantive claims, it should be up to U.S. courts, to the extent that the petitioners allege the constructive custody of the United States, to decide. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 8:48 am
., Inc. (17-CA-22607, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 119) Springfield, MO June 4, 2007. [read post]