Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 7:33 am by Kit Johnson
Background The petitioners, Pedro Pablo Guerrero-Lasprilla and Ruben Ovalles, are noncitizens and former lawful permanent residents who filed motions to reopen the cases that led to their removal from the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 11:30 am by Paul Cassell
  Congress could not have been clearer in its direction that using "best efforts" to en­force the CVRA was an obligation of "… [o]fficers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agen­cies of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime …. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 2:36 pm by Robert Loeb
  Before the judge issued that order though, Bebo brought her constitutional challenge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, seeking a declaration that the SEC’s administrative law judges lack constitutional authority to issue such orders. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 2005) [even if petitioner had been seriously alarmed, annoyed or harassed by respondent's conduct—a public demonstration at petitioner's church protesting petitioner's eviction of respondent—there was no showing that respondent's injurious actions were part of a "course of conduct" within the meaning of section 527.6 because the conduct constituted a form of protected speech].) [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 2005) [even if petitioner had been seriously alarmed, annoyed or harassed by respondent's conduct—a public demonstration at petitioner's church protesting petitioner's eviction of respondent—there was no showing that respondent's injurious actions were part of a "course of conduct" within the meaning of section 527.6 because the conduct constituted a form of protected speech].) [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm by Kit Johnson
The parties agree the statute means that U.S. courts of appeals are authorized to consider “questions of law” raised in appeals by noncitizens convicted of certain crimes from decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals regarding their removal from the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
 The framework imposes three prongs on the petitioner: That the proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance; That the foreign national is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; and On balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Trump, the President of the United States, intends to file a motion to dismiss this action on the ground, among others, that the United States Constitution, including the Supremacy Clause contained therein, immunizes the President from being sued in state court while in office. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Rodriquez, No. 06-1646 A sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is reversed where, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), the "maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" for the state drug convictions at issue was a 10-year maximum set by the applicable state recidivist provision. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The Petitioner is Teamsters Local 215. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am by Eric Rassbach
The Blaine Amendments found in most state constitutions, including Montana’s, resulted from Blaine’s failed attempt to amend the United States Constitution. [read post]