Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
United States “retroactive have focused on the three circuits where prisoners are being denied permission to file successive petitions,” that focus “is a mistake. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
Abbott scheduled for oral argument before the United States Supreme Court on January 12, 2010. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:38 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 3:06 pm
Let me introduce you to Ozenne v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Premo v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
And a final-final USPTO decision can then be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:18 am
., v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:08 am
United States Attorney Laura E. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 9:54 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of the petitioners, Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah reiterated that the plain terms of Section 233(a) are broad enough to preclude Bivens actions even if Congress did not specifically contemplate such actions. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 1065 (1997). [8] Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Chatman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:49 am
Zamfir v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
United States 12-18-1967Question:Does the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the police to obtain a search warrant in order to wiretap a public pay phone? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]