Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:41 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm
Hays: Actually, Your Honor, the United States and Canada do, and the analysis- Justice Scalia: Well, wait … You're writing our opinion for us, are you? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" Stalley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
However, copyright law has another provision that allows copyright owners to block the importation of copyrighted works into the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:45 am
Rather, if plaintiffs believe the injunction is no longer valid, their recourse is to go back to the court where the injunction issued and challenge it there.In a footnote, the 11th Circuit references a recent 2009, United States of Court of Appeals D.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
The judge noted that while the 4th Amendment usually does not “apply to searches by foreign authorities in their own countries, even if the targets . . . are American citizens”, an exception applies “when the participation of United States agents in the investigation is so substantial that the action is a joint venture between the United States and foreign officials. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
Abbott scheduled for oral argument before the United States Supreme Court on January 12, 2010. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
Underpinning the decision in this case are two key cases, N v Home Secretary [2005] UKHL 31 and D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 423. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:54 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:13 am
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the 11th Circuit held that in calculating compensation, the federal government could take advantage of the fact that the local government's restrictive land use regulations had severely depressed the value of the acquired property. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
United States, a "closely watched federal tax case involving the scope of the work-product doctrine. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:45 pm
Yes, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm
The Solicitor General then files a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States government. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Abbott Docket: 08-645 Argument date: January 12, 2010 Question presented: Under a treaty signed by the United States, a child taken from his home country in violation of a "right of custody" generally must be returned to that country. [read post]
