Search for: "Young v. Ins*" Results 7321 - 7340 of 7,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:21 am
In a decision regarding an order to show cause in the case, called Nosek v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:50 am
Attorney for Butler; James Young of Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
  The one case to discuss the Ex Parte Young rule in a copyright context (Richard Anderson Photography v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:27 am
Peters gave the direction to a young associate that constitutes one of the charges against her. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
The two men on Louisiana's death row for raping young girls are the only two people in the country who have been sentenced to death for a crime in which death did not result. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The answer seems to be in one of the few exceptions to sovereign immunity, the doctrine that one can sue state officials in their official capacity if one is seeking only injunctive relief — an order to stop the infringing activity — rather than money damages (the Ex parte Young doctrine). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Because of the release of the Court’s opinion in Baze v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:34 pm
Justice Burnyeat in British Columbia (Public Guardian and Trustee) v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:43 am
  Here is the abstract:In his concurring opinion in Coit Independence Joint Venture v. [read post]