Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 7341 - 7360 of 7,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
  The agreement will add about $60-million in revenue and a little over 110 lawyers in Hong Kong and a small office in Beijing (with a license application pending to open in Shanghai), and, most importantly for Reed Smith, puts it on the third of the three continents where global firms needs to be in today's Flat World. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
" 2007 WL 3332708, at *10 n.12.In that footnote, Judge Fallon cites a case, Smith v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Smith, 786 F.2d 1011, 1012 (11th Cir. 1986)); see also Ritter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:02 am
Some thoughts after the jump.1) The court insisted that the regulations were not neutral or generally applicable, thus taking the case out of Smith and into Lukumi. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:00 am
George Orwell's novel tells the story of Winston Smith, a member of the Outer Party living in the ruins of London, a chief city in the totalitarian super-state of Oceania. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 pm
Teva and Upsher-Smith recently submitted new comments to FDA regarding acarbose 180-day exclusivity (see FDA Law Blog). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:14 am
If it is not enumerated, then the statutory canons sink its application. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Coyote Smith wants your comments. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:36 pm
The remaining, just-below-the-normal-approval-bar applicants (the "control group") were rejected in line with the lender's normal credit policy. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
    IntroductionOn September 28, 2007, Judge Winifred Smith of the Superior Court of Alamada County, California, took the extraordinary measure of invalidating an election result - an event that has only happened once before in California's history.[1] Measure R, originally voted upon in November 2004, was ordered back onto next year's ballot not because of electoral fraud or force majeure, but because 96% of the results from the election had vanished.[2] There… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Today the COA has issued its ruling, notable in part for the 3 pages of names lined up on the side of Smith & Wesson: In Smith and Wesson Corporation, et al v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 12:37 pm
Gordon Smith that previously highlighted the case in the context of a discussion about the duties that founders of entities owe each other. [read post]