Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
My Analysis of this Verdict As A California Wrongful Death Lawyer: Damages in a wrongful death claim based upon the state of the law in CA are very difficult to place a dollar figure on and even more difficult to argue to a jury! [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Carol Williams reporting in the LATimes does a superb job of describing California's Lewis Carroll like parole system for those sentenced to life in prison for murder, with the possibility of parole; a topic which has given the California Supreme Court cause for psycho-therapy and now looms over the 9th Circuit (Hayward v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
It settles the law. [read post]
Rehearing granted and modified opinion issued in arbitration case: Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Corp.
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
” Under these circumstances, such waivers are unconscionable under California law and should not be enforced. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:43 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently considering this argument in a case called State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Spear Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm
He suggested that the position “may well be fact sensitive”, pointing to the differences between the position in law of the ISPs in Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201), Bunt v Tilley (2006 EWHC 407 (QB)), and of Google Inc in Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. (2009 EWHC 1765 (QB)). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:42 am
Dinan v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:39 am
One of these cases, D’Este v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm
This wave of cases isn't exactly a flood, but compared to the state of the law a few years ago, the number of 1-to-1 ratio cases in recent years is remarkable. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:54 pm
Note: The two previous pieces published in The Yale Law Journal Pocket Part this summer are Agency Preemption Inputs in Riegel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
In the 1961 case Hoyt v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
The other Supreme Court decision of interest today to criminal law junkies is Giles v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:12 am
The decision issued after a bench trial in Garvey v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Whereas I would sign on to today's California Supreme Court's opinion, which holds that there is no common law duty for even big-box stores to have automated external defibrillators (AEDs) on their premises.A court that was revolutionary might well find such an obligation. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 12:37 pm
However, the reigning California case on this issue (Ross v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Apple trial took place.It's a cross-appeal as Epic is appealing the dismissal of its federal antitrust claims under the Sherman Act, while Apple is appealing the consolation prize Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers handed Epic in the form of an anti-anti-steering injunction under California state law (Unfair Competition Law).I think the correct outcome would be for Epic to prevail on market definition and some other issues, and the part under state law would then… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
The denial of review means that Lane will stand as California law binding on all state trial courts. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
California. [read post]
