Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 7341 - 7360 of 8,416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
That report recommended converting the cash Cole agreed to forfeit into a drug quantity for sentencing purposes, see United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:27 pm
  Or, the parties can leave it up to the judge to decide.In a recent unpublished Appellate Division decision of Bonder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:49 pm
  A good outcome for Twitter obviously, as any cash settlement would have set a nasty precedent. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
TILDEN; PO BOX 232 HUMANSVILLE MO-Missouri  121 Prenger's Cash Saver Highway 24 C Route 2 Box 41 Huntsville MO-Missouri  122 H & L SUPER MARKET HIWAY 17 NORTH PO BOX 325 IBERIA MO-Missouri  123 Chrisman Plaza Apple Market 405 East 24 Highway Independence MO-Missouri  124 Price Chopper 4201 S. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
In short, both are extremely useful, but if you are pressed for time (or cash) pick Waddams over Hutchinson for your summer reading and then pick up Hutchinson sometime during first term when his more practical tips will be better appreciated. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:46 pm
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 8, 2009 - 11 AM: Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
  The "receivership estate" is law talk for the assets of the failed bank that the FDIC is able to marshal and turn into cash. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
  By contrast, Title V - "Agricultural and Forestry Related Offsets" - identifies an "initial list" of specific types of agricultural and forestry practices that would qualify as offsets, and gives the Department of Agriculture authority to establish a program governing the generation of offset credits from agricultural and forestry-based sources. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:31 pm
" As an example, the court cited Zaxis Wireless Communications, Inc. (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 577, 582-583 for the proposition that a "$300,000 punitive damage award [can be] upheld despite large negative net worth where defendant had annual gross revenues in excess of $100 million and cash on hand of $19 million. [read post]