Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2016, 9:48 am
The Plaintiff Was Born Prematurely by an Emergency Cesarean Section The plaintiff in the case of Wally G. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:47 pm
This is clearly stated in CPL 220.60[3]; and is the court’s ruling in the cases of People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:23 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 10:37 pm
” J.I. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 588 (2003) (criminalization of same sex sexual conduct is unconstitutional), United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm
The case of Loomis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:25 am
In Cooke v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
[1] People of the State of California v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
B. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Taglieri, which involves the “habitual residence” provision of an international child-abduction convention. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:30 am
iStock_000000114540_1.jpg In child pornography prosecution, in the absence of any showing that the officers had a direct or personal financial interest in the result of the case, the trial court properly excluded cross-examinationthat the Sheriff's Office would receive about 25 percent of the proceeds resulting from the forfeiture of the defendant's home, in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:08 am
Carrascosa v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:18 pm
That seems pretty clearly unconstitutional to me, since it doesn't fit within the narrow Brandenburg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 11:00 pm
The case is: HAL obo MML v MEC for Health, Free State [2021] ZASCA 149 See also: Part 1 and Part 2 [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:31 am
The court in Coates v Watson stated that the state of the law as it was: “…undermines child support’s laudatory purposes and denies some children the financial support of both parents and contributes to the poverty of custodial parents, mostly women and vulnerable children who as a result of illness and disability are unable to leave the care of a parent. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
In the case of Sheik v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:40 pm
In Robelin v. [read post]
