Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York" Results 7341 - 7360 of 10,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2011, 3:41 am
An appeal of an arbitration award must be perfected within the controlling statute of limitationsRodriguez v NYC Transit Authority, 269 A.D.2d 600, Motion for appeal denied, 96 N.Y.2d 704 Hermino Rodriguez was dismissed from his position of cleaner with the New York City Transit Authority after being found guilty of disciplinary charges by a tripartite arbitration board. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am by SHG
  The out-of-state defendants are not amenable to suit in New York. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am by CJLF Staff
  The system is expected to launch by the end of the year in New York City and Washington, D.C., and will eventually spread to most if not all U.S. cellphones in the upcoming years as people exchange their old phones with new devices containing a special chip that will allow them to receive the messages. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
City of GoletaDocket: 10-1125Issue(s): Under Palazzolo v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm by admin
  An excerpt from the original New York state Constitution   New York's Article XVI, §1 states clearly:   Section 1. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:29 am by admin
NEW YORK—The Justice Department alleged May 3 a wholly owned Deutsche Bank AG subsidiary fraudulently misrepresented its mortgage lending and underwriting practices for years while participating in a federal mortgage-insurance program that to date has led to $386 million in losses (United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Vitro originally had a Chapter 15 case in New York before U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
City of New York balances 1) the “character” of the government action; 2) the economic impact of the regulation on the plaintiff; and 3) the when the regulation has destroyed the plaintiff’s legitimate and reasonable “distinct investment-backed expectations. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
Employees of a state as an employer may not sue their employer for alleged violation of the ADEA or similar acts of CongressKimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 Section 58 of the Civil Service Law sets out minimum and maximum age qualifications for initial appointment as a police officer by political subdivisions of New York State other than the City of New York. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Earlier this week, it had released a speech he had made on Monday at a dinner in his honor, also in New York City. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:45 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
City of New York, which stressed the essentially “ad hoc, fact-based” nature of a Takings inquiry. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF has released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Here’s an even newer opinion from the New York City bar restricting attorneys from contacting witnesses on social networking sites and using “trickery” to seek online material for litigation purposes.The ethics issue that we raised in our original post – that defense attorneys should avoid trying to “friend” plaintiffs to get a look at non-public parts of their social media webpages – has also been the subject of an ethics… [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:52 pm by Walter Olson
Under New York law, however, the City is wrong, the court reluctantly concludes. [read post]