Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 27,628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant now moves for a new trial as a matter of right within thirty days (30) of the judgment, and thus within the court’s plenary power. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P.38.1(k)(1)(C). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
Because of the objective nature of the test in subsection (1), the issuing authority may be satisfied on the balance of probabilities as to the reasonable grounds even if the protected person denies, or does not give evidence about, fearing the commission of domestic violence. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 am
Penalty means a late charge imposed by the payee for paying after the disbursement is due.It does not include any additional charge or fee imposed by the payee associated with choosing installment payments as opposed to annual payments or for choosing one installment plan over another. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:52 am
Pariser and the borrower against the bank in both proceedings: (1) all claims involve a common nucleus of facts – the decision of the bank to deem itself insecure, made demand under Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The text of s. 35(1) does not provide a clear answer to this question. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[4] H.B. 1497, § 1(1) [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
However, as the description only uses exclusively the term “arranged” (“angeordnet”), it is not unequivocal that the term is used in its narrower meaning in claim 1.Therefore, claim 1 does not require the heat exchanger to be fixed to the internal combustion engine.[2.2.3] As the cooling air fan according to claim 1 is an integral part of the internal combustion engine, what is claimed is that there is no further part between the cooling… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
Switching from Paper to Electronic K-1s Provided that the electronic K-1 is an exact copy of the official Schedule K-1 and the partnership follows the procedures in the revenue procedure above, a partnership does not need to gain the approval of the IRS before switching to electronic K-1s. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[4] H.B. 1497, § 1(1) [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Section 103 became law on January 1, 2012. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:45 am
Source: Tax Foundation. 2018 State Business Tax Climate Index Ranks and Component Tax Ranks Overall Rank Corporate Tax Rank Individual Income Tax Rank Sales Tax Rank Unemployment Insurance Tax Rank Property Tax Rank Alabama 35 22 22 49 11 12 Alaska 3 26 1 5 25 38 Arizona 21 13 18 47 15 6 Arkansas 39 39 30 44 32 22 California 48 32 50 41 13 13 Colorado 18 18 15 39 35 14 Connecticut 44 31 37 27 19 49 Delaware 15 50 34 1 3 20 Florida 4 19 1 29 2 10 Georgia 36… [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:06 pm
FASCSA orders apply as follows: Table 1. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:18 pm
The original elective-share fraction of one-third of the decedent’s estate plainly does not implement a partnership principle. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:58 am
With regard to argument 1, here are my thoughts. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:52 am
“if my daughter does not survive me by 30 days, then I give her share to be divided equally between her own children” Beyond the distribution of your estate, your Will would also name somebody to take charge of everything – your Executor. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Section 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
This decision contains an interesting discussion of whether a correction of chemical formulae in the claims led to an inadmissible extension.Claim 1 of the sole request before the Board was very similar to claim 5 of the patent as granted:1. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:06 pm
Answering the first question in the negative, the Court noted that the term “prevailing party” does not appear in §1132(g)(1) and that nothing in §1132(g)(1)’s text purports to limit the availability of attorneys’ fees to a “prevailing party. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:07 am
In accordance with the Opinion of AG Emiliou, the Court held that it does. 1. [read post]
