Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
There are general venue provisions[1] and special venue provisions. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
The following is extracted from the Supreme Court’s press summary: The court considers three issues: (1) do the conditions of entitlement for SPC give rise to direct discrimination? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:52 pm
So for now I'm safe, all electricity works most of the time (as does the Internet), and all my stuff is intact. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
That means that in order to be patentable the invention must meet the patent eligibility test in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
That means that in order to be patentable the invention must meet the patent eligibility test in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
For example, OHIM could allow communications by email, as the General Court does [What! [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:07 am
How does it feel?) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Teleflex Inc., the Federal Circuit has erred in applying a “lead compound test” as the exclusive standard for determining whether a patent claim directed to a new chemical compound is “obvious” and therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
How does it feel?) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
Definitions In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
While hepatitis B and C can turn into chronic hepatitis, hepatitis A generally does not; although it can lead to liver failure and death. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm
The Applicant filed a Reply Brief, arguing as follows: The Examiner's Answer asserts that because the applicants' specification does not expressly disclose a computer product on a computer readable medium, claim 10 does not satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. ... [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:44 pm
How much easier does it get? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:45 pm
This decision was based on the Indiana Code Section 35-46-1-5(a). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Ct. 3218 (2010) (invalidating Bilski’s claimed invention – a method of hedging against the occurrence of bad weather – as an unpatentable abstract idea); · Limit the doctrine of export infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:49 am
" In that case the Court was considering the importance of rights under Section 5A vis-`-vis Section 17(1) and Section 17(1)(A) of the Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Between the two of us I change more often than she does. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:55 pm
Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619, 35 L. [read post]
