Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 7341 - 7360 of 45,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 6:26 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
In this case the employee made a protected disclosure to her line manager. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
Here's the abstract:This Symposium Essay considers the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 12:12 pm
Garrett's disregard of the law, he had sufficient opportunity to avoid the accident:    Walker v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Peter J. Sluka
 Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:40 pm
My post from last Friday's ERISA decision in Amara v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In line with London County Council v Church Wardens and Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Erith in the County of Kent [1893] AC 562, the Court held that “the true test is whether the occupation is of value”. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:23 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court – The Lines Are Drawn In The Mach Mining Appeal Déjà Vu All Over Again: EEOC’s Fiscal Year-End Lawsuit Blitz Once Again Catches Dozens Of Employers In Litigation Net The Defense Amicus Briefs Submitted To The SCOTUS In EEOC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
They set out a bright line rule – that a link by itself should “never” be seen as publication of the material to which it refers – that seems too simplistic. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:52 am by David Fraser
The Supreme Court of Canada today released its decision in Information and Privacy Commissioner et al v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The United States Senate recently passed a bill, which is now under consideration in the House of Representatives, requiring on-line retailers to collect use tax on behalf of states whose residents are failing to pay the use tax when they make an out-of-state purchase using the internet. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:36 am by Eric
On Thursday, Judge William Alsup concluded the district court phase of the Oracle v. [read post]