Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Dunn and McGrain v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:04 am
His first was R. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:52 am
The court, however, may choose to mandate inpatient treatment but it has to make findings and not delegate the power to the probation officer.U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
” In a lengthy footnote, it addresses perhaps the most powerful case marshalled by McKeever in support of his position: Haldeman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
See People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:01 am
The Supreme Court decision in Ohio et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Gorsuch was also hesitant, at first, to talk about landmark cases that were mentioned by Grassley, such as Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Gorsuch was also hesitant, at first, to talk about landmark cases that were mentioned by Grassley, such as Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
In Kilgore, et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
Where it ceases to be lawful to detain a person pending deportation there is no longer a power of detention under paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, and there is therefore no longer a power to grant bail under paragraphs 22 or 29. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
But in Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
On those questions, the Court certainly has the power to say, in the words of Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:26 am
[reflections from Robert Leider on the oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:45 pm
In Barboza v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Elias LJ held that the section 21 power was wider than the section 23C power. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:35 am
The key issues on appeal related to the following: Whether the ARB’s powers including the power to make decisions on matters bordering on IP, were lawful? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 7:08 pm
The New Jersey case is a more extreme example of the sort of situation that the federal Supreme Court upheld in its notorious 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
In the claimants’ cases, the level of difficulty in establishing causation was held to be a determining factor in this test, and accordingly it would not be equitable to utilise the s 33 power. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
