Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7341 - 7360
of 37,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:48 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:28 am
Wis. 2009) (declining to decide on the question of whether Section 230(e)(2) applies to the plaintiff’s state law claims) Eighth Undecided No case available Ninth Yes Perfect 10 v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:26 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
The Court has also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Compton School District v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
Where D2 aids and abets D1 to commit a single crime, for example where D2 provides D1 with a weapon to commit a robbery. c. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:29 am
The Court referred to two CJEU decisions (Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der Deutschen Bühnen (C-267/06) and Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-147/08)), which confirmed that unless evidence establishes that there would be unacceptable economic or social consequences of giving effect to the deceased’s entitlement to a survivor’s pension for his husband, at the time that this pension would fall due, there was no reason that… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:21 am
” The question decided in Cotey Wynn et al v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Conclusion Key Findings The American Rescue Plan Act’s restriction on states’ Fiscal Recovery Funds being used to directly or indirectly offset a net tax cut is vague and raises difficult questions of interpretation and application. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
"); State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
Shahdad v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Moreover, the Supreme Court’s judgment explicitly stated that the subject matter of the case was limited to an employment dispute and did not concern the applicant’s fundamental rights. [read post]
