Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 173,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
"] From T.F. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
From Judge Edgardo Ramos's decision Tuesday in Jacob v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm
South Lake Tahoe Property Owners Group v City of South Lake Tahoe, 92 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm
Playing catch-up: Laws protecting cultural property in the United States need an update. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
So the Montana Supreme Court holds, in Groo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Elster concerns the Constitutionality of Section 2(c)’s content-based restrictions based upon state-law privacy and publicity rights when the content identifies political public figures. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:10 am
Jones v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:33 am
Prodigies Child Care Mgmt. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:30 am
But it’s possible to comply with both state and federal law, there’s no preemption by impossibility. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:26 am
Clemente Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:25 am
HomeLight, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am
This year, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
And, when she resisted, she was eventually terminated.Since such conduct allegedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed civil litigation (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Group v. [read post]