Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 29,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2012, 11:27 am
Following the Third Circuit’s ruling in Wachtel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
The ruling is consistent the holdings in Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady, decided together and reported in 252 A.D.2d 82, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 93 N.Y.2d 999. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
Sheri had plans to meet a friend at 9:00 a.m. for coffee.State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:24 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 3:11 pm
The contract required that the parties abide by the IDOT Standard Specifications and the plans specified in the general contract. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
Moves by a Custodial Parent Within the State and Outside of the State - What are the Considerations?
8 Sep 2008, 2:36 am
In light of 9:2-2, the New Jersey Supreme Court in its seminal decision of Baures v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am
To avoid the same fate as the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, which was struck down by the conservative Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:17 pm
(See Shefts v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
’State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
Even under Kelo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:00 pm
Links in Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:13 pm
The opinion in Woollard v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Companies Outside California with Employees in California: Companies incorporated or with their principal place of business outside California with employees based in California will need to develop compliance plans. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:23 am
In Gull Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Benefits available to certain New York City management personnel modified by subsequent personnel order issued by the mayorMatter of Kinach v de Blasio, 2018 NY Slip Op 04425, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Mayor's Personnel Order No. 2016/1 established certain paid leave benefits and modified a planned salary increase and reduced the amount of annual leave for managers with 15 or more years of experience. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
In Matter of Kaur v. [read post]