Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 7341 - 7360 of 11,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2012, 3:26 am by Attorney Christopher A. Pearsall
This threshold, a high bar, has not been met yet," the seven state Court of Appeals justices said in their 21-page opinion. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:53 am by Lori Howell
Juvenile Justice Reform How revision of the state budget could affect San Joaquin County (Record Net) Governor Jerry Brown's revision of the California state budget could mean the Division of Juvenile Justice would continue to operate, but its budget would be cut by $24.8 million. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:13 am by Louis M. Solomon
   As we have posted on, the Supreme Court has addressed the question whether such state law can prohibit such waivers of class action treatment. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:36 am by David J. DePaolo
And the 4th District Court of Appeals didn't disagree.In Allgreen Landscapes et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm by Brad Pauley
  This week we also note that the Court has ordered the Committee of Bar Examiners to show cause why an undocumented immigrant should be admitted to the State Bar. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:12 pm by lawmrh
Does 8 USC § 1621, subdivision (c) apply and preclude this court’s admission of an undocumented immigrant to the State Bar of California? [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:56 am by The Complex Litigator
 California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115 states, in part: "Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
California, 11-8851, involves whether the trial court’s use of a defendant’s prior juvenile adjudication, in which he was not afforded a jury trial, to trigger a sentencing enhancement that doubled his state prison sentence violated his right to due process and a jury trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:09 am
The Senior Wallaces stopped paying the loan 11 months after taking it out, prompting a lawsuit in state court from Pinnacle. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:45 am by John Lewis
  But, in light of Concepcion, the Ninth Circuit held that the FAA preempted California’s state law prohibiting arbitration of claims for public injunctive relief. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:00 am by immigrationprof
On a controversy that has been brewing, the California Supreme Court yesterday unanimously issued an order directing the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California to show cause before the Supreme Court why the court should grant... [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
  Technically, the Bar reports to the state’s Supreme Court, but at the same time the Governor can prevent the Bar from collecting its dues, and as a result the state legislature is known to put pressure on the Bar as well. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
  Technically, the Bar reports to the state’s Supreme Court, but at the same time the Governor can prevent the Bar from collecting its dues, and as a result the state legislature is known to put pressure on the Bar as well. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:39 pm by rmorgan
Andrea Roth quoted in San Francisco Chronicle, April 15, 2012 Most states had similar rules until 30 or 40 years ago, when some passed laws barring a claim of self-defense outside the home if the person could have fled safely, said Andrea Roth, a UC Berkeley law professor…. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:54 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (tribal records)Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:39 pm by Brad Pauley
’” Former state senator Joe Dunn, now the State Bar’s executive director, said:  “‘Our state judiciary is being economically starved to death. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
In any event, it appears that the Grove, as a pretty large open-air shopping mall, is barred by the California Constitution, as interpreted by the California Supreme Court in Robins v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:41 am by Abbott & Kindermann
As the settlement discussions were undertaken (ultimately unsuccessful), the property owners were left in a indeterminate state as to what to do with their property. [read post]