Search for: "True v True"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 33,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
Or even if that's what he actually thought, was opposed to letting the case go.I mention this both because I think it's true as a general matter and also because there's some reason to think that that's what may have transpired here. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 1:59 pm
With the added bonus that it happens, in a ton of cases, to be entirely true. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
At trial, Kenney's defense is basically that the DVRO wasn't valid because -- and this latter part is clearly factually true -- he hadn't been served with it yet. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" True that.The victim's name was Jack Swaim. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
”During cross-examination, Lena held true to his threat and refused to answer any questions. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
It's true that Peter never filed his own motion that said "Decide if the prenup is valid and make the required findings. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm
I suspect that Idaho courts -- indeed, many state courts -- would say that's not true. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
But he's still liable for attempted murder.Similarly, here, if it's true that the defendant intended to, say, empty all ten rounds in the clip against the officers, and the jury found that he would have in fact done so but for being shot in the interim by the police officers, then I don't know why his attempt liability couldn't reasonably be based on the 10 shots he intended rather than merely the three he successfully fired off. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
His attorney seems to have told him that he might be able to avoid being deported if he retroactively got his sentence reduced, which isn't really true; the guy was basically definitely going to be deported.On that basis, the Court of Appeal holds that Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:18 pm
So long as the defendant had expressly admitted in the settlement agreement that he owed the $27,000, then it'd be a true "compromise" and hence valid. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 9:34 am
Callahan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:40 am
In Beckley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
For instance, in NAACP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
This principle is not true, however, for works of visual art. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 5:37 am
Thus, when he lost his job, there was not a true change in circumstances as required for the court to consider modifying a custody arrangement. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:33 am
All true. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm
In Marchig v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
In Lifson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
The Facts Behind Martel v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court decided Grady v. [read post]
