Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 7341 - 7360 of 44,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
Out of the 24 decisions handed down so far by SCOTUS this term, I award the coveted "Golden Blinkers" prize for most Senselessly Formalistic Statutory Interpretation to Watson v United States (06-571). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm by Jonathan
On June 7, 2010, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in the case of Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:39 am by Kevin Johnson
  Guided by the deeply rooted presumption against retroactive legislation, we hold that §1101(a)(13)(C)(v) does not apply to Vartelas’ conviction. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am by SHG
United States, Justice Elena Kagan might be right that “most of Government is unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 09-11311), the Court threw this understanding into doubt, suggesting a considerably more expansive interpretation of the residual clause. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]