Search for: "A P.2."
Results 7361 - 7380
of 26,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2008, 6:45 am
Lili Levi (University of Miami - School of Law) has posted Chairman Kevin Martin on Indecency: Enhancing Agency Power (Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 60, p. 19, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 7:38 pm
Martinez (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1093, 218 Cal.Rptr.3d 140, 394 P.3d 1066 (Martinez) to argue that the court’s jurisdiction to do so was not extended by Penal Code section 1202.46 because the restitution was not for losses incurred “as a result of the commission of a crime. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
P. 47.1. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:57 am
This is a good summary of the case law in this area.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:37 pm
" ********************************************************* Jeffrey P. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Prusa & Edwin Vermulst, Guilt by association: US – Measures Relating to Shrimp from Thailand and US – Customs Bond Directive for Merchandise Subject to Anti-Dumping/Countervailing DutiesChad P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
” (P. 1146.)6 Continue reading "Colorblind? [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:56 am
Feldstein 20/1 Christopher Sims 25/1 Lars P. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:24 pm
Food history interviews revealed a strong association (p-value = 0.0002) between eating chiles rellenos with becoming ill with Salmonella Enteritidis. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:04 pm
Maintain the status quo. 2. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
§ 30116(a) and (f) (formerly 2 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 3:30 am
” (P. 1.) [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:52 am
Wood wrote in the 2-1 ruling that found Stevens' defense inadequate. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:15 pm
P. 12(b)(6) (see analysis beginning at page 43 of the opinion linked to above). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
Ohio July 2, 2009). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:18 am
The USPTO announced the new guidelines saying: [P]atent examiners will continue to consider (1) the scope and content of the prior art, (2) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art, (3) the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art, and (4) objective evidence relevant to the issue of obviousness. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
(p. 2)Those of you who chose law schools to be closer to home, or because you wanted more practical preparation for practice (a demonstrated strength of NSU's), feel good about your choice! [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
The lawsuit also names Joseph P. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
The case was assigned to Chief Judge Philip P. [read post]
