Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
A technological battle erupted between Palm and Apple. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
On the other hand, that deeper consideration will, itself, make universities less attractive targets for litigation, which seems to be the chosen weapon in the battle to narrow educational fair use. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 3:16 am
Supreme Court's complete decision here: Lane v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
In the Phyrric battle over access back in 2007, the Commission declined to allow an extremely mild form of access. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:08 pm
" In fact, the wrongness has to be as overpowering as a very old and very dead fish, per the Fourth Circuit's opinion today in TFWS, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
In Kenefick v City of Battle Creek, __ Mich App __ (2009) (approved for publication July 2, 2009), a city ordinance requiring owners of abandoned homes to pay a "monitoring fee" was challenged on grounds that it was both unconstitutionally vague and violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:58 am
A recent United States Supreme Court has again brought IDEA to the forefront. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:14 pm
In the back and forth battle between companies and former employees regarding the confidential nature of customer information, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska has just issued a decision of note in Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See Wells v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
In a joint opinion, the committees state that accepting legal fees from such a company, or dividing with the company a fee paid by a homeowner, constitutes impermissible fee-sharing, and an attorney who engages in such a practice "imperils his or her license to practice law. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Just found them via Google Alerts and only have had time to read FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe… [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica) United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents How… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:23 pm
In Cuomo v. [read post]
