Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7361 - 7380 of 16,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Nordock v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Corn grown by farmers who did not buy Syngenta’s products gradually became contaminated with the MIR 162 and Event 5307 traits through cross-pollination from neighboring fields. [read post]
So, the fair hearing has a higher burden of proof than the initial investigation (fair preponderance of evidence v. some credible evidence). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Developing such international agreements will be challenging, but the alternative is an increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional system for cross-border data requests that benefits no one. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” Can the state force the baker to design, bake, and deliver the multi-tiered cake to the cross burning and Klan gathering? [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
Perhaps the monkey-taken selfies do not cross the thresholds of substantiality and originality? [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Decisions reflect underlying instinct about a type of notice: crossing boundaries into something eligible for copyright protection/remaining in state-law eligible area. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am by Elina Saxena
Wells  also  linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Previous reports, later confirmed by the U.S. military, made clear that only a handful of the original 54 fighters remained engaged in the fight, but that an additional 70 fighters crossed the border from Turkey into Syria yesterday. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Church maintained that the two sales at its bookstore in Illinois, together with its ability to sell the goods to out-of-state parishioners who cross state lines to attend the church, were sufficient to satisfy the "in commerce" requirement because they have an effect on interstate commerce.As to the first transaction, it was not clear whether the purchaser was a resident of Illinois. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:46 am by Wells Bennett
Have a look at this interesting, conditional cross-petition filed last week by attorneys for Aaron Graham—one of two defendants in United States v. [read post]