Search for: "David Reader"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 8,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2022, 4:24 pm
The Ocean’s Whistleblower: The Life and Work of Daniel Pauly by David Gremillet (translated from the French by Georgia Froman) This one is for our environmental whistleblowers. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 am
Recent Developments in Contested Heritage[1] Few aspects of this section will come as a surprise to readers of L&RUK, apart perhaps, for the report on developments at the King Charles the Martyr, Falmouth, in the Diocese of Truro, infra. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm
David Borden was shopping for life insurance online. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:50 am
First there was my Notable Property Persons series which began with a bang with David Salusbury, Chairman of the National Landlords Association. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 11:06 am
Meanwhile I, and quite possibly you, dear reader, have shifted in our sense of the power of literature along with the age and demoted it. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:53 pm
PDF Help – Information on downloading and using the PDF reader. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:56 pm
“On July 11, I contacted the (store’s) helpline and was instructed by ‘Agent David Goodfellow’ that it would be ‘ready within days,’” she wrote to the firm in a letter dated Aug. 24. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:12 pm
If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
In addressing this state of affairs, the court employed colourful language, aphorisms and Latin phrases which certainly keep the reader interested. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:37 am
Perhaps a comparison to David Weisbach's paper on line-drawing would have been even closer, but we hadn't covered that in the colloquium.Perhaps the most prominent and important disparity in the paper, and certainly the one we focused on the most, is the "gain limitation" rule that applies to dividend treatment of boot under section 356, but not to the treatment of dividends generally. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
He concludes that the limiting effects Protocol 30 will have will be minimal (if any at all), but reminds his readers that we may be getting a definitive answer on the matter once the case of NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-411/10) is decided by the CJEU. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:59 am
Lazar Radic and Friso Bostoen both wrote pieces taking readers through a typical day in worlds where self-preferencing is prohibited. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:21 am
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 243 F.3d 244, 252-53 (6th Cir. 2001); David L. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:28 am
Its tone and content approach the catechetical, patiently instructing the reader in each dimension and application of his work. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:51 am
David McKenzie reports for CNN; Gerald Imray reports for AP News. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:37 pm
(Regular readers of Balkinization will recognize the structural similarity of the argument to the debate about torture and whether there are ever any costs (as well as obvious moral gains) to an absolute prohibition on torture.)This, then, brings me to my title and its reference to the 1% solution, which has gained currency because of its use--and implicit criticism--in Ron Suskind's recent book about the "Cheney doctrine," which is that we must engage in pre-emptive attacks… [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 1:54 pm
He also offers our readers some recommended books to improve regulatory practitioners’ skills. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:59 am
Providing jacket-cover testimonials were Steven Kay QC, Philippe Sands QC, Professor and former Ambassador David Scheffer, and Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
As for the authors’ professed concern about “rule of law,” readers should note that the Jurs and DeVito article completely ignores the remedial amendment to Rule 702, which went into effect on December 1, 2023, to address the myriad inconsistencies, and failures to engage, in required gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony.[10] The new Rule 702 is now law, with its remedial clarification that the proponent of expert witness opinion must show the court that the… [read post]
