Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7361 - 7380 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by Steve Hall
The bill took effect on Sept. 1, 2009, but does not apply retroactively.According to information provided by Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman Jason Clarke, Meadoux is one of 20 juvenile offenders serving life without parole in this state. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 894 against the defendants listed above. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Saloshin,[1] a dentist entered into a lease arrangement in which he remitted 20% of the gross revenues from his dental practices to the lessors, as partial payment for renting the space. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yet the distinction is very difficult to explain and defend. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Lull Engineering Co., 20 Cal.3d 413, 573 P.2d 443, 455-56 (Cal. 1978). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
As of March 1, there were nearly 63,000 persons on Texas' public database administered by the state's Department of Public Safety, which adds roughly 100 new names to the list each week. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:44 am by Stefanie Levine
Curiously, since the third patent, the ‘870 Patent does not qualify for inter partes reexamination, reexamination of this patent was not sought at all. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
"More waters open to fishing does not mean the Gulf shellfish harvest is getting back to normal. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
[emphasis added] The Plaintiffs have based their opposition to the motion largely on the basis of R. 21.01(1)(b), that there is no reasonable cause of action. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:52 am by Adam Goodman
Implement a suspension of a length of 1-20 days. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Since the Brussels I Regulation does not cover extra-territorial scenarios, the rationale of the ECJ’s judgments in Gasser, Turner and West Tankers does not apply. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm by Gideon
A conviction under subsection (1) is a Class C felony carrying a maximum prison term of 10 years and a conviction under subsection (2) is a Class B felony, carrying a maximum prison term of 20 years. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Eric
July 20, 2010): "the anti-SLAPP statute's public-participation requirement does not exclude speech communicated through the medium of the Internet. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by David Lat
In response to the controversy, the NYU Law administration expressed disagreement with her statements, but defended her right to make them. [read post]