Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Criminal Procedural Law § 210.20(g) states in pertinent part that after arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof upon the ground that the defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
Federal warrants issued by Maine Superior Court judges are valid under Rule 41. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
Federal warrants issued by Maine Superior Court judges are valid under Rule 41. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
JEFFERSON COUNTY Criminal Practice Warrantless Search Does Not Fall Under Emergency Exception People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
The whole point of the business judgment rule is to prevent courts from even asking the question: did the board breach its duty of care? [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
ANDREW FAUCETT V. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
(Bell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
If the agency’s action is ministerial, CEQA does not apply. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:51 am
Superior Court, supra, 97 Cal.App.4th at p. 1290.) [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:24 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 2009 WL 4044429 (Cal. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
The Supreme Court's guidance is worthy of citation at length: "We frequently have cause to believe that the judges of the superior court are too reluctant to exercise their power of granting a new trial for insufficiency of the evidence, and too much inclined to acquiesce in a verdict of the jury which does not meet with their own approval.... [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:29 am
In Laczko v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Carol Williams reporting in the LATimes does a superb job of describing California's Lewis Carroll like parole system for those sentenced to life in prison for murder, with the possibility of parole; a topic which has given the California Supreme Court cause for psycho-therapy and now looms over the 9th Circuit (Hayward v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Montgomery County v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Put another way…, does either body constitute in effect an alter ego of the High Court? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
