Search for: "High v State"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Court just handed down its decision in Holder v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm
State, 13 P.3d 489, 494 (Okla. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
In KT4 Partners LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:51 pm
See, Serwatka v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:17 am
Additional Resources: Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
” These include the dismantling of terror cells in Portland, Oregon, and Lackawanna, New York, as well as the conviction of several Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliates operating in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:54 am
Mr Justice Burton concluded his judgment by stating that the choice by an insured of his own lawyer did not "of itself constitute the taking of an unreasonable step".___________________________________ 1(1) Christine Brown-Quinn (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) Motorplus Ltd: Webster Dixton LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) ACM ULR Ltd: (1) Janine Baxter (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
Weisler & State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:59 am
See Gotlib v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Last Thursday, in the case of Ahurogeze v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Castro, 14-cv-01699-MEH (2) Glapion v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 2:25 am
Sen v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
A later court decision fortunately reversed this order, which was clearly unconstitutional; and Wednesday the Massachusetts high court (Van Liew v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
The MBTA also specifies a maximum penalty of $15,000 and six months in prison for a misdemeanor violation, but does not require any particular mental state or "mens rea" [i.e. guilty mind] to violate the statute. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
Ferdinand Benjamin v. [read post]
