Search for: "I v. B" Results 7361 - 7380 of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 1:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
The judicial branch may not discard that statutory framework in favor of an “I-know-it-when-I-see- it” standard for patentability under § 101. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
At ACSblog, she observes that, “[b]ecause the Court could muster only a single sentence, historians – not journalists and law professors – will be the ones who tell the story of Flores-Villar v. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 11:14 am by Giles Peaker
Comment I think there is a bit of an issue here. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Type I/Type II errors: people sue b/c stock price went down; he thinks that’s bad. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Another Taylor police officer also testified that defendant admitted that he searched GL's name on the LEIN system while they were discussing defendant's criminal case, although he stated at the time, `I'm not even sure why I did it. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
  In other posts, I have explained what such a motion (made under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) is intended to do. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:00 am by Avery Welker
I had my midterm on March 19, 2021 – six days before the Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The current definition of “attendant care,” which is not significantly different than in past versions of the statute, is as follows: Florida Statute 440.13(1)(b). [read post]