Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2008, 9:31 pm
To make matters worse, in many cases consumers won't even be damaged by the printing of a receipt with their credit card number. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
You would also want to review the matter with your client before filing the petition and prepare a letter that the client signs, acknowledging the aggressive position and the potential risk of defending a dreaded Bankruptcy Code §707(b) motion that the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
The Court rejected this claim stating that “[t]here is no rule that requires a financial advisor to follow the same protocol every time it renders a fairness opinion. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
Isn’t that exactly what today’s decision in Friends of Scott Walker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 12:48 pm
It is therefore a matter of some confusion as to why the section 706(b) good faith defense is necessary. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm
You can’t even go to jail for it. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
To simplify matters, I am going to conflate the two and concentrate on the burden of persuasion. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:08 am
“It matters whether the staff can step in and handle the conflict in a manner that is respectful and positive to all parties involved. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:46 am
§§ 78j(b), 78t(a). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 12:45 pm
On reconsideration, OHA didn’t budge. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
§ 3102(b), and the Edge Act, 12 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Resources Code, § 21167.6(b)(3).) [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
In such a situation, "aiding the enemy" does not violate State A's obligations to State B during the armed conflict - like treason, the aiding is a purely domestic matter for State A. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:32 pm
But the new substantive charge in Count #1 isn’t a felony – it’s just a misdemeanor, right? [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:40 am
Under Rule 23(a)(3), “[t]he claims of the named plaintiffs must be consistent with those of the class,” Benway, at 423. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
R.A.P. 1925(b)) is violated by the losing side’s “preserv[ation of] every unfavorable ruling and contested issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
`Dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6) is appropriate when a defendant raises a statutory bar,’ such as lack of timeliness, `as an affirmative defense and it is clear from the face of the complaint, and matters of which the court may take judicial notice, that the plaintiff's claims are barred as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
The reason these questions are so confusing to our political culture is that the moral and legal logic don’t map onto one another all that precisely. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
§ 812(b)(1)(B). [read post]
