Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 7361 - 7380 of 42,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 2:23 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
It pays to have an experienced legal advocate by your side during each and every step of the investigation, litigation, and trial of such a matter. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
But, Breyer continued, he didn’t see evidence that the snap caused the kind of “material and substantial disruption” that Tinker requires. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:49 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In its opposition brief, Defendant relied on the “4/5 Rule,” which states that, “a selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:31 am by ArborYpsi Law
There are some exceptions to this general rule, however, as demonstrated in a recent opinion in a matter in which the defendant argued the court admitted inappropriate evidence in his domestic violence trial. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Kalvis Golde
No type of fact-finding, he argued, judicial, legislative or otherwise, “mattered much in those decisions. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:36 pm by Brian Stull
Ten years later, the federal courts cited AEDPA in denying his claim that law enforcement hid evidence of his innocence at his trial. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:44 pm by Unknown
Commissions allowed people to vent their frustrations, put those frustrations in print to be handed back to the public, and then closed the matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm by Patricia Hughes
(Or, Why A Feminist Thinks Section 33 Does Matter)” I said, “Whatever merits it might have, dressed up as a means to represent the will of the people against the follies of unelected courts, recourse to section 33 may actually legitimate the continuation of prejudice. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Mark Latham
It then tackles what it terms the 3rd Circuit’s “double barreled ‘clear statement’ rule,” which PennEast characterizes as requiring the delegation by Congress of two things with “unmistakable clarity” before a private party can initiate an eminent domain proceeding in federal court against a state property owner: (1) the federal eminent domain power and (2) the federal government’s exemption from 11th Amendment sovereign immunity. [read post]
An individual may assert the privilege in response to a direct line of questioning or, in some cases, a request for specific evidence. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
But in the EU IPO ...Moreover, after the UK decision at first instance the EU IPO ruled on the validity of the EU registration based on essentially the same evidence in a case brought by another entity, Horvath's Spezereyen Kontor und Lebensmittelproduktion GmbH. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Accordingly, the appellate panel reversed the district court’s order certifying a class and remanded the matter for further proceedings. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm by Phil Dixon
Despite the “significant” evidence against the defendant presented at trial, evidence of a confession is uniquely impactful. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:25 am by Chris Castle
Let me illustrate with an anecdote (one that does not involve HFA, or MRI for that matter). [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
” It would also suggest that the creators of the Statute wanted to allow non-states to authorize ICC investigations and ultimate prosecutions despite the lack of any evidence of this intent in the drafting history of the treaty.Nonetheless, the Chamber continued by ruling that the PA’s accession to the Statute complied with all relevant procedures, and met no objection from the ICC’s governing Assembly of States Parties. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm by John Floyd
”   39.14 Requires Disclosure of Evidence Material to Any Matter Involved in the Matter   The Court added: “The answer to that question turns upon whether these exhibits’ constitute or contain evidence material to any matter involved in the action. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 606(B) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 5:48 am by Andrew Delaney
” While SCOV is cool with most of the environmental court’s decision in the matter, it’s not convinced the nighttime-noise conclusions are legit. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
In this article, Stone and Evans discuss the landmark rulings in Lange v. [read post]