Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7361 - 7380 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the case the United States filed an amicus brief noting all of that and arguing in favor of Ms. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:37 am by Jeremy Tyler
., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, disagreed with that logic, holding that a policyholder did not have to give the insurance company a second chance before suing it.In Ocean View Towers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:28 am by Dan
How easy or hard is it to get judicial assistance in the United States? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:51 pm by Calvin Massey
 In short, the Montana Supreme Court identified a number of reasons why corporate expenditures to elect or defeat candidates for state office, or contributions to a candidate or his PAC , are compelling reasons to abridge the speech rights of corporations, but those reasons are ones rejected by the Court in Citizens United. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
   After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]