Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 14,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 7:59 am
Disability - In an apparently regressive judgment in Dalco Engineering v Padhye (March 2010), Justice Raveendran of the Supreme Court has held that the non-discrimination obligations under the Persons with Disabilities Act apply only to the State, and not to the private sector. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:44 pm
The court in Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:47 pm
[The Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 10:53 am
See, e.g., Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:46 am
. - Raymont, V., Salazar, A.M., Lipsky, R., Goldman, D., Tasick, G., Grafman, J.. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:00 am
Koepp v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Johnson said minority enrollment has fallen despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:01 am
Under that test, an entity is exempt from the Board's jurisdiction as a political subdivision if it is either(1) created directly by the State so as to constitute a department or administrative arm of the government, or(2) administered by individuals who are responsible to public officials or to the general electorate. . . .The "courts and the Board generally consider whether a majority of the employer's governing bodyâ€â [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:30 am
One of those two employees was unsure if the person underneath was a man or a woman, according to the court documents.The case used to illustrate the doctrine in my torts casebook was Yania v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm
The Virginia statute was enacted to “ensure [Virginians] ready access to public records in the [state government’s] custody . . ., and free entry to meetings of public bodies wherein the business of the people is conducted. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
And it’s their right to make choices about their own body. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:59 am
Additional Resources: Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
State, 286 S.W.3d 321, 329 (Tex. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
