Search for: "State v. Code" Results 7361 - 7380 of 27,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2018, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Article 2315 of Louisiana’s civil code provides that “[e]very act whatever of man that causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
Section I of the French IP Code requires a work to merely be one which involves application of mind and for it to be an expression in material form. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The court rejected Pussy Riot’s arguments that their performance had been politically and not religiously motivated, and they were sentenced to one year and eleven months imprisonment for hooliganism motivated by religious hatred and enmity, committed in a group acting with premeditation and in concert, under Article 213 § 2 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:48 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 The first decision was published in 2011 by the 3d DCA in Habeeb v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The preamble to the Bill also acknowledged that s. 33 was only being invoked given the pressing public nature of the dispute, as well as the legal ambiguities that were currently at stake due to the appeal underway, Whereas Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights an (sic) Freedoms, exists for the purpose of permitting publicly accountable legislators to finally determine essential economic and social policy; and Whereas the present state of the law is unclear as to the meaning of… [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 11:23 am
Often times, there is a dog bite occurring when a person is trying to break up a dog v. dog attack when attempting to save their small dog from being attacked by a larger dog. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:23 am by Patricia Salkin
The court first found that Catskill Heritage Alliance had stated a valid claim in its first lawsuit because if there were ambiguities in the zoning code, the planning board should have referred them to the zoning board before making a decision on the special permit application. [read post]