Search for: "State v. Law" Results 7361 - 7380 of 155,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Below is today's Criminal Law Appellate Court opinion: AC30974 - State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 10:03 pm
But that would be a simple matter of applying state contract law to the underlying facts of the contract-not the type of issue that typically gains the Supreme Court’s attention. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 1:56 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA); Discretionary Function Exception) United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:22 am by thejaghunter
“King County Superior Court Judge Catherine Shaffer determined that Washington law does, in fact, prohibit cities and other municipalities from restricting firearms possession. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by webmaster
Concepcion] essentially preempts all California law relating to unconscionability,” the Mission Viejo panel sharply rejected this absolutist interpretation of Concepcion, stating:  “We disagree, as the case [Concepcion] simply does not go that far.”   [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:01 pm
Stamm in Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:10 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Here is today's criminal law Appellate Court opinion:   AC31821 - State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court (1) has consistently held that federal antitrust law does not displace state antitrust law (see, for example, California v. [read post]