Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 21,971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 8:21 am
Nursing student is suspected of drug use, declines drug test. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:38 am
The plaintiff’s recovery went well, but there were subsequent complications. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
German Plaintiffs A group of plaintiffs wanting to sue VW in Germany over the emissions scandal sought the Jones Day documents through an application under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
German Plaintiffs A group of plaintiffs wanting to sue VW in Germany over the emissions scandal sought the Jones Day documents through an application under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:57 pm
Pet Plaintiffs: What Can I Do if My Pet is Hurt in a Crash? [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:37 pm
The facts indicate that the plaintiff had been at a medical clinic, with the goal of reviewing test results with a nurse-practitioner. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:55 am
The plaintiff, who had worked as a crane operator for Boeing, was diagnosed in June 2014 with a degenerative disorder that affected his ability to use his extremities. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
In that case the Court does not explicitly adopt any of the various tests for standing, merely finding that the Plaintiff might be able to meet one of them if he repleads, which she orders. *** Because policies are so easily changed most courts will not agree that an ADA lawsuit based on a discriminatory policy has been mooted by a change in that policy. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
Instead, the court deemed the term to be merely descriptive of the services, and then found that plaintiff had demonstrated secondary meaning as to hotel reservation services, but not as to travel agency services. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 8:46 am
At this point, plaintiffs appealed and the court found that the lower court used the right standard to determine whether there was a single accident or two separate accidents, but that there were not enough facts in the record for the court to apply that test and make such a determination. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:34 pm
The matter went before a jury, and after deliberation, found the auto manufacturer was negligent for failing to test the van’s seat belt system and that this negligent failure was the cause of plaintiff’s serious injuries. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
She also declined to say whether the inspectors collected any environmental swab samples from the restaurant for pathogen testing. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
Last week, Judge Mazzant granted the States and business groups plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and invalidated the regulation. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
Last week, Judge Mazzant granted the States and business groups plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and invalidated the regulation. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:05 am
Faced with the prospect of having to defend another costly test-case trial in a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving over 9,000 plaintiffs, the defendants (petitioners before the Court of Appeals) filed a writ of mandamus challenging the district court’s decision that they waived their jurisdictional and venue objections (known as a Lexecon waiver). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:05 am
Faced with the prospect of having to defend another costly test-case trial in a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving over 9,000 plaintiffs, the defendants (petitioners before the Court of Appeals) filed a writ of mandamus challenging the district court’s decision that they waived their jurisdictional and venue objections (known as a Lexecon waiver). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:05 am
Faced with the prospect of having to defend another costly test-case trial in a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving over 9,000 plaintiffs, the defendants (petitioners before the Court of Appeals) filed a writ of mandamus challenging the district court’s decision that they waived their jurisdictional and venue objections (known as a Lexecon waiver). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:02 am
Judge Rendell dissented in part, concluding that the majority failed to apply the unambiguous test in Vance. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:50 am
On summary judgment, the district court found that the updated salary-level test contained in the final rule does not give effect to Congress’ unambiguous intent. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:47 am
A Heritage Foundation podcast features a discussion with Jack Phillips, the plaintiff in the case, “about the challenges of creating art and doing business in keeping with conscience in the 21st Century. [read post]
