Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
(Aquilino v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
In Small and others v (1) Boots Company Plc (2) Boots UK Limited, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that where a bonus scheme uses the word “discretionary”, the Tribunal must look at all aspects of the bonus scheme in order to determine whether or not it is, in fact, discretionary. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
[footnote omitted] (original emphasis)Thereafter his Honour referred to the use of the word “knowingly” in civil proceedings with particular reference to that word in relation to the tort of deceit as discussed by the High Court in Magill v Magill (2006) 231 ALR 27. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:43 am
" They suggest increasing line items for community mental health services to preserve matching funds for federal block grants and restoring prior levels of funding for probation/diversion programs, TCOMMI (mental health) funding, and drug treatment. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am
As one might expect, suppression granted wasn't the gut reaction. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Corop. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Tenn. 2003) was included in the record before us on appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
This isn’t “conclusory,” it’s a fully adequate procedural rebuttal—“conclusory” is a criticism that can only be leveled at a party that bears the burden of proof. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Guttman is a director at Grant & Eisenhofer where he heads the Federal False Claims Act and whistleblower practice. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
Ct. 2783 (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Which brings us to Ung and DiDonato. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
They had an equally potent incentive for Using Tort Settlements to Cartelize (Ian Ayres). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
And, as a result, Judge Grossman decides that he must grant U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Ex Parte Schmieding (12:01 Tuesday) A new model for patent and trademark depository libraries (Director’s Forum) Patent backlog hinders nation’s job creation (PatentlyBIOtech) US patent counts, 2010 (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) 2011 patent reexamination filings continue uptrend (Patents Post-Grant) Avoiding a stay pending patent reexamination: Osmose v Arch Chemicals; Richtek v uPI Semiconductor (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents… [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Last month the Supreme Court delivered judgment in AP v DPP [2011] IESC 2, which concerned an appeal against the High Court’s refusal to grant an order prohibiting a fourth trial of the applicant. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
In today’s case (Derbyshire v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:46 pm
Vázquez-Salceda et al. (2008). [read post]
