Search for: "United States v. May" Results 7361 - 7380 of 47,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
Department of Homeland Security, when it held that immigrants in expedited removal proceedings have no constitutional rights regarding their application to enter the United States—and thus may be denied habeas corpus at the legislature’s discretion without violating the Suspension Clause. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
In this case one of the Administrative Patent Judges hearing the case at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was APJ Matt Clemens, who previously represented Apple as a defense attorney in patent infringement matters prior to joining the board... [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Child Evangelism Fellowship of Dauphin County, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:04 am by Jerold Schneider
That year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit unanimously ruled en banc in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Philippine The Press Gazette had an article “Filipino government shuts down major news network during pandemic” United States A Pennsylvania hobby company filed a defamation lawsuit accusing Mattel, Rubik’s Brand, Velcro and four other companies of falsely claiming it sold counterfeit products, causing Amazon.com to remove it from its online platform. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
Any photographs or photograph albums depicting persons, vehicles, weapons or locations, which may appear relevant to gang membership, or which may depict the item being sought and or believed to be evidence in the case being investigated on this warrant, or which may depict evidence of criminal activity. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:03 pm
On January 17, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the award issued by an arbitral panel in 2007 in the case of Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court held that the courts of the United Kingdom do have jurisdiction to judicially review an Order in Council which is made on the advice of the Government of the United Kingdom acting in whole or in part in the interests of the United Kingdom. [read post]