Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,881
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:38 pm
Ace Patents Corp., 315 U.S. 126, 137 (1942); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Carliner took the case to the Supreme Court, daring the justices – in the year after Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) (available here). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
It is well established that the courts are under a duty to construe domestic legislation which has been enacted to give effect to the UK’s obligations under the EU Treaty so as to give effect to those obligations (Pickstone v Freemans plc [1989] AC 66; Litster v Forth Dry Dock & Engineering Co Ltd [1990] 1 AC 546). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
States, supra); Ace Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:03 am
The use of Effient® products in combination with aspirin for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with ACS who are to be managed with PCI is allegedly covered by the claims of the '703 and '325 patents. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:03 am
Well, they did; in State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:22 pm
” Ace Elec. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Therefore, what the member states earn in official fees, they will typically lose in corporate or income taxes. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:16 pm
I will discuss Shaw Development v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Applying the American Cyanamid [1975] AC 396 test, he turned to the first of the three limbs - is there an arguable case. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am
Dodelson v AC Holdco, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On the first question, the Judge drew parallels to ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] AC 1158 which established, as a starting point, that a person under criminal investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
In Inmacs Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
