Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 721 - 740
of 798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
DOES MAY REALLY MEAN MUST ? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Both sides are adamant in their positions. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman provides text analytics for all four. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
Phil Weiser pweiser Colorado Adam Winkler adamwinkler UCLA Mary Wong marymagistra UNH Kevin Woodson unyoung_ Drexel Joshua Wright Josh_D_Wright George Mason Tim Wu superwuster Columbia Jane Yakowitz JaneYakowitz Arizona Sandi Zellmer SandraZellmer Nebraska Jonathan Zittrain zittrain Harvard Christopher Zorn prisonrodeo Penn State [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman offers relevant statistics about five front-runners. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
Phil Weiser pweiser Colorado Adam Winkler adamwinkler UCLA Mary Wong marymagistra UNH Joshua Wright Josh_D_Wright George Mason Tim Wu superwuster Columbia Jane Yakowitz JaneYakowitz Arizona Jonathan Zittrain zittrain Harvard Christopher Zorn prisonrodeo Penn State [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Segall, Adam Feldman, The Elite Teaching The Elite: Who Gets Hired By The Top Law Schools? [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm
Trump (DMD 3/10/2025) Judge Adam B. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the justices’ behavior during recent oral arguments and finds “subtle signs from the past few days providing support for the view that the Justices and particularly the Chief Justice feel some relief” as the election season has drawn to a close. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:39 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman assesses the performance of “attorneys [who] have argued cases across the last five Supreme Court terms, from 2013 through 2017. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Feldman and Raymond T. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman provides text statistics from this week’s opinions. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at statistics from this week’s oral arguments, focusing on the gender balance among the justices and attorneys, and noting that at Wednesday’s argument, which featured three female advocates, “accounting for Justice Thomas’ regular silence at oral argument, the gender breakdown of speakers … was six women to four men for the first time in the Court’s history. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
At Empirical Scotus, Adam Feldman also explores the effect a Gorsuch vote might have in various areas of the law, summarizing the judge’s most-cited opinions and his dissents. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman compares several aspects of Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing to those of all previous nominees to the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Coverage of both developments comes from Lyle Denniston of this blog, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST (who does the same), and Adam Liptak of The New York Times. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the justices’ relative power over time, comparing cases that were decided by a one-vote margin, and concluding that Chief Justice William Rehnquist is “the clear leader. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman tests the theory that the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Mark Walsh for Education Week’s School Law Blog, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Josh Gerstein at Politico, Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro at Law.com, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Sam Baker at Axios, Jaclyn Belczyk at Jurist, Richard Wolf for USA Today, and Jess Bravin at The Wall Street Journal, who reports… [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the justices’ use in recent majority opinions of citations to separate opinions in prior cases, concluding that “[t]he justices utilize this practice in varying degrees, but as a general matter, they appear to frequently look to past separate opinions to rehash old ideas and to help justify new ones. [read post]
