Search for: "Ali v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
See Ali v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1-4 February 2016. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
R (Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 25-26 February 2015. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1–4 February 2016. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
” State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
R (Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 25-26 February 2015. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
Whilst Scotland and England/Wales were two separate jurisdictions, they were not separate Member States. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In White v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:10 am
Wertsch, and Ali Wyne. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
Ali Khan, The Qur'an and the Constitution, 85 Tulane Law Review 161-190 (2010). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale made clear that the question for the local authority (following on from Birmingham CC v Ali – our note here) is essentially about the future, ie the probability of the acts continuing in the future (“This is the limiting factor. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
This is most explicit in Johnston v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:56 am
The Court did not hold in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
“ He says of the decision in JR17: And yet in its decision of 23 June 2010 in the Northern Ireland appeal JR 17 [2010] UKSC 27, the UK Supreme Court refers to and relies upon Lord Bingham’s approach in Ali v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
