Search for: "Allen v. People"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Allen, No. 06-5077 "Defendants' sentences resulting from their robbery of rare books from a university's special collections library and attempts to sell them at auction are vacated and remanded for resentencing pursuant to the government's cross-appeal, where the district court erred by excluding objects dropped in a stairwell from its valuation of loss, and correspondingly, from its computation of the sentencing range. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
Mack v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:34 am
Loper says the judge wants to give the state and the defense in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:25 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This is why Professor Allen writes that “congealed distrust indicates political failure”. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
” (Tiffany A., supra, 150 Cal.App.4th at 1357, quoting the California Supreme Court case of People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Allen, 392 U.S. 236, 243 (1968); finally, the statute must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Allen No. 1-97-42, 1997 WL 691448, *2 (Oct. 30, 1997) (reading "purpose of being abusive, threatening, annoying, or harassing" as meaning a "purpose to mistreat another person, to express a threat to another person, to irritate another, or to persistently torment"); State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Huq, a British firm which sells people’s location data, has admitted that some of its information was gained without seeking permission from users. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
The position is arguably not as clear as David Allen Green suggests. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The FTC has lamented post-merger price hikes for life sustaining drugs (see FTC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
[1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
