Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
Baker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Baker, No. 15-457 (U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 12:27 pm
The opinion is identified as D.L. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm
FTC) The anticipated impact of the ED Pennsylvania decision(ATS Tree Services v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Circuit, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said that the baker “was entitled to a neutral decisionmaker who would give full and fair consideration to his religious objection,” and that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was not neutral in its ruling against the baker. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:28 pm
Evidently, Maclachlan hasn't heard about 35 USC 271(e)(1) or Merck v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
The 2 remaining cases are Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 2:27 pm
In Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
Resolving a current split amongst multiple federal circuits, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
Prior Judgment of Indefiniteness Triggers Collateral Estoppel Despite PTO’s Finding of No Invalidity
12 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm
JuxtaComm-Texas Software, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:52 pm
Gray later founded the law firm of what is now Baker, Botts, which is underwriting the composition of the opera based on the court case of Emeline v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:23 am
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:14 am
" Eli Lilly and Company et al v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 8:39 am
Baker & Dr. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:55 pm
California Coastal Commission and the "rough proportionality" test of Dolan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:20 pm
Pursuant to Baker v. [read post]
